In some cases, prosecutors and judges may be reluctant to recommend or order restitution because it appears that the individual who has been convicted of the crime is unlikely to be able to make immediate payments. While this may be true, individuals who cannot pay restitution in full may be able to make regular, partial payments and may become more able to meet their restitution obligations over time with employment and other assistance. Indeed, consistent, small payments can be more important than periodic large payments in ensuring full payment of financial obligations in the long run.

For these reasons, judges and prosecutors should order and pursue restitution in all cases where it is appropriate. In cases where a victim does not wish to collect restitution, policymakers should establish mechanisms to pass restitution along to the recipient of the victim’s choice, such as a particular charitable organization.

Agency administrators should also provide regular training programs to emphasize the importance of victim restitution to criminal justice personnel. Training should address methods for improving collections as well as guidelines for using additional incentives and sanctions to encourage payment.